Edited by Elies van Sliedregt and Sergey Vasiliev
Innovative study of the impact of divergent judgments in international criminal law, assessing whether they undermine the legitimacy, coherence, and efficiency of international criminal justice
Identifies areas of law in need of harmonization and makes suggestions as to whether and how this can be achieved
Ultimately argues that pluralism can be a beneficial feature of international criminal justice, allowing for different cultural and legal values
